Subscribe options

Select your newsletters:

Please enter your email address:

@

Your email address will only be used for the purpose of sending you the ITER Organization publication(s) that you have requested. ITER Organization will not transfer your email address or other personal data to any other party or use it for commercial purposes.

If you change your mind, you can easily unsubscribe by clicking the unsubscribe option at the bottom of an email you've received from ITER Organization.

For more information, see our Privacy policy.

News & Media

Latest ITER Newsline

  • Vacuum vessel repair | A portfolio

    Whether standing vertically in the Assembly Hall or lying horizontally in the former Cryostat Workshop now assigned to component repair operations, the non-conf [...]

    Read more

  • European Physical Society | ITER presents its new plans

    The new ITER baseline and its associated research plan were presented last week at the 50th annual conference of the European Physical Society Plasma Physics Di [...]

    Read more

  • Image of the week | The platform's quasi-final appearance

    Since preparation work began in 2007 on the stretch of land that was to host the 42-hectare ITER platform, regular photographic surveys have been organized to d [...]

    Read more

  • Cryopumps | Preparing for the cold tests

    Before being delivered to ITER, the torus and cryostat cryopumps are submitted to a  comprehensive series of factory acceptance tests. This is not sufficie [...]

    Read more

  • Fusion technologies | Closing a fusion schism

    Historically, inertial confinement and magnetic confinement approaches to fusion have been parallel, separate processes. The ITER Private Sector Fusion Workshop [...]

    Read more

Of Interest

See archived entries

ITER Council

Project metrics confirm performance

The governing body of the ITER Organization, the ITER Council, met for the twenty-first time on 15 and 16 November 2017 under the chairmanship of Won Namkung (Korea). Representatives from China, the European Union, India, Japan, Korea, Russia and the United States reviewed a detailed set of reports and indicators covering both organizational and technical performance, and concluded that the project remains on track for success.

Despite the extremely demanding construction and manufacturing schedule and the challenging technical requirements of the ITER Tokamak and support systems, ITER Council members confirmed that the project continues on a path to success, with strengthened management and a strong ''One-ITER'' team mentality. (Click to view larger version...)
Despite the extremely demanding construction and manufacturing schedule and the challenging technical requirements of the ITER Tokamak and support systems, ITER Council members confirmed that the project continues on a path to success, with strengthened management and a strong ''One-ITER'' team mentality.
In November 2007—ten years ago exactly—the ITER Council convened for the first time in the history of the ITER Organization. Clearing had just begun on the ITER site, the ITER design was under review, and only 170 people were working in temporary offices, housed by ITER's host and neighbour—the CEA Cadarache research centre.

Twenty Council meetings later and a quantum leap forward, the ITER Organization assesses the level of manufacturing completion for First Plasma components and systems at 61 percent and the level of total construction work scope completion through First Plasma at 49 percent.

Since early 2016, the ITER Organization has been controlling and reporting project progress on the basis of high-level milestones. Whether related to construction, manufacturing or deliveries—or rather to programmatic milestones like recruitment and contract signatures—these milestones are underpinned in the schedule by the many thousands of activities that make up progress to First Plasma, with each one representing a firm achievement on the road to ITER operation.

Foreground, from left to right: Sachiko Ishizaka, ITER Council Secretary; Won Namkung, Council Chair; Bernard Bigot, ITER Director-General; and Eisuke Tada, Deputy Director-General. In the background, Akko Maas, Science Engineering Officer; Sriram Kattalai Ramachandran, Head of the Finance & Procurement Department; and Laban Coblentz, Head of Communication. (Click to view larger version...)
Foreground, from left to right: Sachiko Ishizaka, ITER Council Secretary; Won Namkung, Council Chair; Bernard Bigot, ITER Director-General; and Eisuke Tada, Deputy Director-General. In the background, Akko Maas, Science Engineering Officer; Sriram Kattalai Ramachandran, Head of the Finance & Procurement Department; and Laban Coblentz, Head of Communication.
During the two-day meeting, participants confirmed that the ITER Organization and the Domestic Agencies have achieved all Council-approved milestones for 2016 and 2017, maintaining strict adherence to the overall project schedule and critical path. Processes for schedule control, risk management and cooperation also continue to improve, with project performance metrics that now measure physical progress in construction, manufacturing, assembly and installation down to the level of each building system and component. 

The Council continued its candid discussions acknowledging continuing efforts made by each Member to overcome various challenges, which include ensuring approval of the cost baseline, as concluded at the Nineteenth ITER Council in November 2016 (IC-19¹). Council members reaffirmed their strong belief in the value of the project, and its mission and vision, and resolved to work together to find timely solutions to ensure ITER's success.

Photos from the twenty-first ITER Council (IC-21) can be viewed here.

Download the full press release in English or French.

¹ As stated in the press release of IC-19 on 27 November 2016, at that time: "The overall project schedule was approved by all ITER Members, and the overall project cost was approved ad referendum, meaning that it will now fall to each Member to seek approval of project costs through their respective governmental budget processes."


return to the latest published articles